Author :
Abstract
Çalışmada, İstanbul İli içerisindeki çeşitli randomize seçilmiş olan okullardaki öğretmen takımları ve öğretmen liderlikleri ölçülerek, bu okulların öğrenci başarıları ile öğretmenlerin takım ve liderlik dereceleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir Çalışma sonuçlarına göre takım çalışması ve liderlik algıları demografik özelliklere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark göstermemektedir (p>0,05). Liderlik uygulamalarında sadece içsel liderlik boyutu medeni duruma göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık göstermiştir (p<0,05). Takım çalışması ile liderlik boyutları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Okul başarı sırasının takım çalışması (r=0,308; p<0,001) ile hem de dışsal liderlik (r=0,256; p<0,001) ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönde bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Takım çalışmasının okul başarısı özerindeki etkisinin daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Nitel analiz sonuçları, genel olarak öğretmenlerin liderlik ve takım çalışmasına uyumlu yapılarının olduğunu, ancak bu kavramların yeterince incelenmediğini ortaya koymuştur.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, teacher teams and teacher leadership in various randomly selected schools in Istanbul were measured and the relationship between student achievement and teachers' team and leadership degrees were investigated. According to the results of the study, teamwork and leadership perceptions do not show statistically significant difference according to demographic characteristics (p> 0.05). In leadership practices, only internal leadership dimension showed statistically significant difference according to marital status (p <0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between teamwork and leadership dimensions (p> 0.05). It was found that there was a statistically significant and positive relationship between school success and teamwork (r = 0,308; p <0,001) and external leadership (r = 0,256; p <0,001). The effect of teamwork on school achievement was higher. The results of the qualitative analysis revealed that teachers generally had a structure compatible with leadership and teamwork, but these concepts were not examined sufficiently.
Keywords
- Baeten, M. ve Simons, M. (2014). “Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects, and condi- tions for implementation”. Teaching and Teacher Education 41 (2014) 92-110.
- Beverborg, A. O. G., Sleegers, P. J. C. ve Veen, K. (2015). “Fostering teacher learning in VET colleges: Do leadership and teamwork matter?”. Teaching and Teacher Education 48 (2015) 22-33.
- Blanco, A. F., Echaluce, M. L. S., Penalvo, F. J. G. ve Conde, M. A. (2015). “Using Learning Analytics to improve teamwork assessment”. Computers in Human Behavior 47 (2015) 149–156.
- Boonla, D. ve Treputtharat, S. (2014). “The Relationship between the Leadership Style and School Effectiveness in School under the office of Secondary Education Area 20”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 112 ( 2014 ) 991 – 996.
- Bowman, R. F. (2010). “Teacher as Servant Leader”. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educa- tional Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78:6, 257-260.
- Chan, S.C.H. ve Mak, W. M. (2014). “Team Identification and Interpersonal Helping Behavior in Work Teams: A Hotel Industry Study”. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13:1, 17-33
- Chbani, W. ve Chibani, P. H. (2013). “Leadership styles of school principals in Lebanon: Mul- tiple case study”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 ( 2013 ) 174 – 176.Chen, C. A. ve Rainey, H. G. (2014). “Personnel Formalization and the Enhancement of Teamwork: A public–private comparison”. Public Management Review, 16:7, 945-968.
- Eliasa, E. I. (2014). “Increasing Values of Teamwork and Responsibility of The Students Through Games: Integrating Education Character in Lectures”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123 ( 2014 ) 196 – 203.
- Erickson, A. G., Noonan, P., Carter, K. S., McGurn, L. ve Purifoy, E. (2015). “The Team Func- tioning Scale: Evaluating and improving effectiveness of school teams”. International Journal of Educational Research 69 (2015) 1–11.
- Fernández, J. R. M., Corcelles, M. ve Cerrato-Lara, M. (2011). “The Conceptions about Team- work Questionnaire: design, reliability and validity with secondary students”. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31:7, 857-871.
- Gray, T. ve Harrison, P. (2003). “Team teach with a student: A pilot study in criminal justice”. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14:1, 163-180.
- Greenlee, B. J. (2007). “Building Teacher Leadership Capacity through Educational Leadership Programs”. JREL, 4(1), 44-74.
- Helstad, K. ve Lund, A. (2012). “Teachers’ talk on students’ writing: Negotiating students’ texts in interdisciplinary teacher teams”. Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (2012) 599-608.
- Jansen, E. P. (2011). “The effect of leadership style on the information receivers’ reaction to management accounting change”. Management Accounting Research 22 (2011) 105– 124.
- Kankaew, V. ve Wannapiroon, P. (2015). “System analysis of virtual team in cloud computing to enhance teamwork skills of undergraduate students”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ( 2015 ) 4096 – 4102.
- Katzenmeyer, M., ve Moller, G. (2001-2009). Awakening the sleeping giant, helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Krecic, M. J. ve Grmek, M. I. (2008). “Cooperative learning and team culture in schools: Con- ditions for teachers’ professional development”. Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (2008) 59–68.
- Ku, H Y., Tseng, H. W. ve Akarasriworn, C. (2013). “Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfac- tion, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning”. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (2013) 922–929.
- Lawson, H. A. (2014). “Investing in Leaders and Leadership to Secure a Desirable Future”. Quest, 66:3, 263-287.
- Lischinsky, O. S. (2013). “Team-based simulations: Learning ethical conduct in teacher trainee programs”. Teaching and Teacher Education 33 (2013) 1-12.
- Mizel, O. (2009) “Teamwork In Israeli Arab-Bedouin Schoolbased Management”. British Jour- nal of Educational Studies, 57:3, 305-327.
- Rasmussen, T. H. ve Jeppesen, H. J. (2006). „Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review”. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 20:2, 105-128.
- Redeker, M., Vries, R. E., Rouckhout, D., Vermeren, P. ve Fruyt, F. (2014). “Integrating leader- ship: The leadership circumplex”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23:3, 435-455.
- Saleem, H. (2015). “The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172 (2015) 563 – 569.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and goodness-of-fit models. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
- Sewell, G. (2005). “Doing what comes naturally? Why we need a practical ethics of teamwork”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16:2, 202-218.
- Tong, D. Y. K., Rasiah, D., Tong, X. F. ve Lai, K. P. (2015). “Leadership empowerment behav- iour on safety officer and safety teamwork in manufacturing industry”. Safety Science 72 (2015) 190–198.
- Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E. Ve Kyndt, E. (2015). “Teacher collaboration: a systematic review”. Educational Research Review, (2015), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002.
- Vries, R. E. (2012). “Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self–other agreement problem”. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (2012), 809–821.
- Wei, L. Q. ve Lau, C. M. (2012). “Effective teamwork at the top: the evidence from China”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23:9, 1853-1870.
